
As ever, in a cash-strapped public university, the class is larger than I would like. While some of my colleagues might balk at the idea that 45 students is a large class, for my own pedagogy and that this is an ethics course as much as a history, law and politics course, always gives me pause. I always struggle with the question of how to provide students the opportunity for developing their ideas about interpersonal communication ethics when the numbers seem to defy the possibilities. So, as I have been doing for several semesters, students will work in small seminars as well as a large cohort, giving them a chance to think about what it means to deliberate, in both small and larger settings, issues of pressing concern where we may disagree, in a way that is productive and ethical. Now, despite that gridlock and inability to communicate across differences seems to be the "new normal" in politics today, I still maintain that these kinds of deliberative spaces are possible, and I owe it to my students to help them think about what it takes to create them.
So, as I begin to chronicle this semester's free speech adventure, I am as ever optimistic and hopeful.
Image courtesy of Mellowbox
No comments:
Post a Comment